Russell v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/12/14 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT G. RUSSELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1882 DAD P
v.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION et al.,
Defendants.
16
By order filed September 29, 2014, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
17
18
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and
19
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
20
21
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1
22
Dated: November 12, 2014
23
24
25
DAD:9
russ1882.fta
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636. (Doc. No. 4)
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
