Rowell v. Zamora, et al
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/23/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 3/16/18, are ADOPTED in FULL; and Defendants' motion to dismiss 36 is GRANTED in part as follows: the official capacity cla ims against defendants Abdur Rahman, Dorothy Swingle, and David Medina are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; the medical deliberate indifference claims based on the prescription of NSAIDs against Rahman, Swingle, and Medina are also DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; and the motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEAN LOUIS ROWELL,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1888-KJM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
L.D. ZAMORA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 16, 2018, the magistrate judge filed amended findings and recommendations,
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
27
the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
28
the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2018, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 36) is granted in part as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
a. The official capacity claims against defendants Abdur Rahman, Dorothy
Swingle, and David Medina are dismissed for failure to state a claim;
b. The medical deliberate indifference claims based on the prescription of
NSAIDs against Rahman, Swingle, and Medina are also dismissed for failure to state a claim; and
c. The motion is denied in all other respects.
DATED: April 23, 2018.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?