Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. DC Transportation Services, Inc., et al

Filing 25

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on January 22, 2015. The Scheduling Conference set for 01/26/2015 is CONTINUED TO 4/6/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Bu rrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. Plaintiff shall take the steps necessary to prosecute this action as a default matter concerning Defendants DC Transportation Services, Inc.; Igor Parfenov, individually and dba DC Transport; and Yevgeniy Bugreyev no later than March 13, 2015. (Rivas, A)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

No.

2:14-cv-01889-GEB-CKD

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

v.
DC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,
INC. a/k/a DC TRANSPORT,
INC.; IGOR PARFENOV; ANDREY
PAVLOV; IGOR PARFENOV d/b/a
DC TRANSPORT; YEVGENIY NIK
BUGREYEV; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff‟s Status Report filed January 12, 2015 (“SR”)

18

reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the

19

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on

20

January 26, 2015, is continued to April 6, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. A

21

joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14)

22

days prior to the Status Conference.

23

DOE DEFENDANTS

24

Plaintiff states in the SR that it “expects to know the

25

identity of any „Doe‟ defendants by March 20, 2015.” (SR 2:28-

26

3:1, ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff has until March 30, 2015, to file a

27

motion in which leave is sought under Federal Rule of Civil

28

Procedure 15(a) to file an Amended Complaint substituting a named
1

1

defendant in place of a Doe defendant. The referenced motion must

2

be noticed for hearing on the Court‟s earliest available law and

3

motion date. If leave is not sought as stated, Does 1-10 will be

4

automatically dismissed from this action.

5

DEFAULT PROCEEDINGS

6

Plaintiff states in the SR that it “anticipates only

7

one

8

filing an application for default judgment . . . within the next

9

several months, by no later than March 13, 2015.” (Id. at 1:24-

10

of

the

defendants

may

possibly

appear,”

and

“anticipates

27, 2:20-22.)

11

Plaintiff shall take the steps necessary to prosecute

12

this

action

13

Transportation Services, Inc.; Igor Parfenov, individually and

14

dba DC Transport; and Yevgeniy Bugreyev no later than March 13,

15

2015. Plaintiff shall either file whatever documents are required

16

to

17

defendants or Show Cause in a writing filed why these defendants

18

should

19

defendants may be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of

20

Civil Procedure 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to timely respond to

21

this Order.

prosecute

22
23

not

as

a

this

be

default

case

dismissed

as

matter

a

for

default

failure

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

concerning

January 22, 2015

24
25
26
27
28
2

matter

of

Defendants

against

prosecution.

DC

these

These