Woodruff et al v. Eli Lilly and Company

Filing 38

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/13/2016 GRANTING request for additional 30-day stay. This action is STAYED for 30-days from the date of this order to allow the parties to finalize a formal settlement agreement. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 David E. Stanley (SBN 144025) dstanley@reedsmith.com 2 Alexis A. Rochlin (SBN 280634) arochlin@reedsmith.com 3 REED SMITH LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 4 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 Telephone: +1 213 457 8000 5 Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080 6 Michael X. Imbroscio (pro hac vice) Phyllis A. Jones (pro hac vice) 7 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One CityCenter 8 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-4956 9 Telephone: +1 202 662 6000 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 Eli Lilly and Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 14 15 CARL WOODRUFF and PENNY WOODRUFF, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 Case No.: 2:14-cv-01890-MCE-SKO ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 30-DAY STAY v. 18 19 ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana 20 corporation, Defendant. 21 22 The Court, having reviewed and considered the Joint Notice of Settlement 23 Status and Request for Additional 30-Day Stay submitted by Plaintiffs and Defendant 24 Eli Lilly and Company (collectively “Parties”) and with good cause showing, hereby 25 orders as follows: 26 /// 27 /// 28 –1– ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 30-DAY STAY 1 1. The above-captioned action is stayed for 30-days from the date of this 2 Order to allow the Parties to finalize a formal settlement agreement. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: June 13, 2016 5 6 7 8 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 30-DAY STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?