Woodruff et al v. Eli Lilly and Company

Filing 45

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/5/2017 ORDERING 41 this action shall remain on the inactive calendar until 5/1/2018 in order to allow the parties to continue to evaluate Plaintiffs' claims under the provisions of the global settlement framework agreement for Cymbalta personal injury cases in various federal and state courts; the parties will submit an updated status report re settlement by 4/16/2018. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 CARL WOODRUFF and PENNY 11 WOODRUFF, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. Case No.: 2:14-cv-01890-MCE-SKO ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL STAY Honorable Morris C. England, Jr. 14 ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The Court, having reviewed and considered the Joint Notice of Settlement Status 18 and Request for Additional Stay submitted by Plaintiffs and Defendant Eli Lilly and 19 Company (collectively “Parties”) and with good cause showing, hereby orders as follows: 20 1. The above-captioned action will remain on the inactive calendar until May 1, 21 2018 in order to allow the parties to continue to evaluate Plaintiffs’ claims under the 22 provisions of the global settlement framework agreement for Cymbalta personal injury 23 cases in various federal and state courts. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 –1– ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL STAY 2. 1 The parties will submit and updated status report re settlement by April 16, 2 2018. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: September 5, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?