Woodruff et al v. Eli Lilly and Company

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/5/2014 GRANTING 4 Plaintiffs' MOTION to STAY and continuing the Scheduling Conference to 2/17/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file a Notice with the Court, indicating the status of the Motion to Transfer within five days of the JPMLs decision of the Motion to Transfer. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION CARL WOODRUFF and PENNY WOODRUFF, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana ) corporation, ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-01890-WBS Complaint filed on 8/11/2014 Sr. Judge William B. Shubb ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING DECISION FROM THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Hearing Date:12/8/2014 Time: 2:00 pm Location: Courtroom 5 Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 23 24 25 26 27 Having considered the issues presented in the Plaintiffs’ Pending Decision from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”), and in light of the pending Motion to Transfer Related Actions for Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) (“Motion to Transfer”) in In re: Cymbalta (Duloxetine) Products Liability 28 1 1 Litigation, MDL No. 2576, with good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Stay and 2 ORDERS as follows: 3 4 5 1. This action is stayed, and the Initial Status Conference on December 8, 2014 is CONTINUED to February 17, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 2. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file a Notice with the Court, indicating the status of the 6 Motion to Transfer within five days of the JPML’s decision of the Motion to Transfer. 7 Dated: December 5, 2014 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?