Fisher v. Unknown

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/20/15 ordering that plaintiff's motion 35 is denied as moot. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARY FRANCIS FISHER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:14-cv-1925 KJM AC P ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On December 18, 2014, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations that 18 recommended that plaintiff be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis because of the “three 19 strikes” provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 31. However, on the same day, plaintiff 20 filed a document stating “I close this case under 41(a)(1) no IFPs. I do not have that right to 21 receive ‘IFPs,’” which the court interprets to be a voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). 22 ECF No. 33. Accordingly, pursuant to the voluntary dismissal, the case was closed on December 23 23, 2014, and the Findings and Recommendations were not adopted or otherwise acted upon. 24 ECF No. 34. 25 On December 29, 2014, plaintiff filed a “Motion to be excused of the 3 strike provision.” 26 ECF No. 35. However, since plaintiff has already voluntarily dismissed this case, and the 27 Findings and Recommendations were not adopted or otherwise acted upon, there is nothing from 28 which plaintiff can be “excused.” 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 35), is 2 DENIED as moot. 3 DATED: January 20, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?