Ramirez v. Fleming, et al.

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/6/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 20 motion to amend. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAUL ENRIQUE RAMIREZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P

v.

ORDER

B. FLEMMING, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights

17
18

action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 2, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion for

19

leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed

20

amended complaint. As a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject

21

to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Since

22

plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it.

23

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend must therefore be denied.

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 2, 2015 motion for leave

2

to amend (ECF No. 20) is denied.

3

Dated: March 6, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1
rami1937.10b

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2