Ramirez v. Fleming, et al.

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/3/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 51 motion to compel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAUL ENRIQUE RAMIREZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P

v.

ORDER

B. FLEMING, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion asking that the court compel defendants to

17
18

provide further responses to certain requests for discovery. In this court’s November 23, 2015

19

scheduling order, the court informed the parties that discovery would close on March 11, 2016

20

and that all motions to compel must be filed by that date. On March 11, 2016, the court informed

21

the parties that all deadlines imposed in the scheduling order would be extended 90 days making

22

the discovery deadline and deadline for filing motions to compel June 9, 2016. Therefore,

23

plaintiff’s motion to compel is not timely.

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 51)

2

is denied.

3

Dated: August 3, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
rami1937.mtc

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2