Bauser v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
11
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/14 ORDERING that the actions denominated 2:14-CV-01946 TLN-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD, 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-KJN, 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC, and 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD be reassigne d to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be sho wn as 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01960 JAM EFB, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB, and 2:14-CV- 01965 JAM-EFB. The Clerk shall make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
KEITH WELDAY, an individual,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
18
19
Defendants.
TOM BAUSER, an individual,
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
23
24
Defendants.
RACHEL CHAVEZ, an individual,
25
26
27
Plaintiff,
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
28
Defendants.
1
Case No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB
RELATED CASE ORDER
Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 TLN-EFB
Case No. 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD
1
MARK JAEGER, an individual,
2
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
3
4
5
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
BRUCE KAUFMAN, an individual,
6
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
10
11
Defendants.
CHRIS GONZALEZ, an individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16
17
KATHRYN VON KOPP, an individual,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
21
Defendants.
22
23
Case No. 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC
Case No. 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-KJN
Case No. 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC
Case No. 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD
Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these
24
actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.
25
2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge
26
and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of
27
judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the
28
parties.
2
1
The parties should be aware that relating the cases under
2
Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are
3
assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation
4
of the actions is effected.
5
court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and
6
magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.
7
Under the regular practice of this
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 2:14-CV-
8
01946 TLN-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD, 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC, 2:14-
9
CV-01961 JAM-KJN, 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC, and 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD
10
be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund
11
F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set
12
in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED.
13
caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown
14
as 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01960 JAM-
15
EFB, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB, and 2:14-CV-
16
01965 JAM-EFB.
17
Henceforth, the
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make
18
appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to
19
compensate for this reassignment.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 29, 2014
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?