Bauser v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 42

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/22/2016 FINDING that this case is related to the actions denominated 1:15-cv-01872 JAM JLT, 2:15-cv-02594 JAM AC and 2:15-cv-02597 JAM CMK within the meaning of Local Rule 123; ORDERING that the magistrate judge assignment in said related cases be reassigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; ORDERING that the caption on all documents filed henceforth in the reassigned cases be shown as 1:15-cv-01872 JAM EFB, 2:15-cv-02594 JAM EFB and 2:15-cv-02597 JAM EFB, respectively. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TOM BAUSER, an individual,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 )
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA, and
)
AGNES MARCALLINO,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 )
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
1

Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB
RELATED CASE ORDER
Related to Nos.:
2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV—01957 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB
2:14-CV—01965 JAM-EFB
1:15-CV-01721 JAM-EFB
1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB
1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB
2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB
2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB
2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB
2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB
2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT

1

11

) Case No. 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-AC
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 )
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
ROBERT L. HOLLANDSWORTH, an
) Case No. 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK
individual,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 )
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)

12

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

RAMON HURTADO, an individual,

13

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.

14

2005).

15

judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial

16

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for

17

the parties.

18

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

19

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are

20

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation

21

of the actions is effected.

22

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and

23

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

24

Under the regular practice of this

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge assignment

25

in the actions denominated 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT, 2:15-CV-02594

26

JAM-AC and 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK be reassigned to Magistrate Judge

27

Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings.

28

caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown
2

Henceforth, the

1

as 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-EFB, 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-EFB and 2:15-CV-02597

2

JAM-EFB.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 22, 2016
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3