Mathews v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time to file her responsive pleading, making it DUE on or by 4/5/15. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DONNA W. ANDERSON, SBN PA 46355 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8930 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Donna.W.Anderson@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 EUGENE CURTIS MATHEWS, 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 20 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 21 Defendant. 22 ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01947-EFB ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER TO EXTEND TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 The parties, through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the 24 25 Court, stipulate that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time to file her 26 responsive pleading, making it due on or by April 5, 2015. This is Defendant’s 27 first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose the 28 /// 1 1 additional time, and agrees that all subsequent deadlines in the scheduling order 2 should be extended by 30 days. 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 7 Dated: February 25, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 8 9 10 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Donna W. Anderson DONNA W. ANDERSON Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 Dated: February 25, 2015 16 17 18 By: /s/ Jonathan O. Peña* JONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff Eugene Mathews (*By email authorization on 0225*/15) 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: March 5, 2015. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?