Mathews v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time to file her responsive pleading, making it DUE on or by 4/5/15. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
DONNA W. ANDERSON, SBN PA 46355
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8930
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Donna.W.Anderson@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16
EUGENE CURTIS
MATHEWS,
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
21
Defendant.
22
) Case No. 2:14-cv-01947-EFB
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
23
The parties, through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the
24
25
Court, stipulate that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time to file her
26
responsive pleading, making it due on or by April 5, 2015. This is Defendant’s
27
first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose the
28
///
1
1
additional time, and agrees that all subsequent deadlines in the scheduling order
2
should be extended by 30 days.
3
4
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
Dated: February 25, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
8
9
10
By:
11
12
13
/s/ Donna W. Anderson
DONNA W. ANDERSON
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
Dated: February 25, 2015
16
17
18
By:
/s/ Jonathan O. Peña*
JONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff Eugene Mathews
(*By email authorization on 0225*/15)
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: March 5, 2015.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?