Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/16/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEREK WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 14-cv-1951 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
19
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and
20
returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule
21
183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address
22
change.
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1
1
and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen
2
days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
3
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
4
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: January 16, 2015
6
7
8
9
Will1951.33
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?