Chavez v. Rite Aid Corporation et al

Filing 9

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/14 ORDERING that the actions denominated 2:14-CV-01946 TLN-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD, 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-KJN, 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC, and 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD be reassigne d to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be sho wn as 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01960 JAM EFB, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB, and 2:14-CV- 01965 JAM-EFB. The Clerk shall make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 KEITH WELDAY, an individual, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 18 19 Defendants. TOM BAUSER, an individual, 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 23 24 Defendants. RACHEL CHAVEZ, an individual, 25 26 27 Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 28 Defendants. 1 Case No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB RELATED CASE ORDER Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 TLN-EFB Case No. 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD 1 MARK JAEGER, an individual, 2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. 3 4 5 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. BRUCE KAUFMAN, an individual, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 10 11 Defendants. CHRIS GONZALEZ, an individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 KATHRYN VON KOPP, an individual, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 v. RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 Case No. 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC Case No. 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-KJN Case No. 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC Case No. 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 24 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 25 2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge 26 and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of 27 judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the 28 parties. 2 1 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 2 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 3 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 4 of the actions is effected. 5 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 6 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 7 Under the regular practice of this IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 2:14-CV- 8 01946 TLN-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 MCE-DAD, 2:14-CV-01960 WBS-AC, 2:14- 9 CV-01961 JAM-KJN, 2:14-CV-01963 KJM-AC, and 2:14-CV-01965 TLN-CKD 10 be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund 11 F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set 12 in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. 13 caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown 14 as 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01960 JAM- 15 EFB, 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB, 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB, and 2:14-CV- 16 01965 JAM-EFB. 17 Henceforth, the IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make 18 appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 19 compensate for this reassignment. 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2014 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?