Kaufman v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 67

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/17 ORDERING that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bruce Kaufman JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) ANDREA B. DICOLEN (Cal. State Bar No. 305555) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com andreadicolen@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 BRUCE KAUFMAN, an individual, 19 Plaintiff, No. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 20 vs. Judge: Dept.: 21 22 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Honorable John A. Mendez 6 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: August 29, 2013 October 23, 2017 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 91369631.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side 3 4 to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Dated: 10/3/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2LEGAL_US_W # 91369631.1 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?