Kaufman v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/17 ORDERING that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bruce Kaufman
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
ANDREA B. DICOLEN (Cal. State Bar No. 305555)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
andreadicolen@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
BRUCE KAUFMAN, an individual,
19
Plaintiff,
No. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
20
vs.
Judge:
Dept.:
21
22
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Honorable John A. Mendez
6
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
August 29, 2013
October 23, 2017
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 91369631.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
3
4
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Dated: 10/3/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2LEGAL_US_W # 91369631.1
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?