Von Kopp v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/20/2015 ORDERING 23 that the Motion to Stay by Rite Aid Corporation is WITHDRAWN 16 ; the parties deadlines to file their joint status report is SET for 5/18/2015, to coincide with the deadline to file joint status reports in the other actions related to this action by the Court's prior orders.(Reader, L)

1

(Counsel of record listed on next page)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH WELDAY, an individual

12
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants

No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB
Related to Nos.
2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01965 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB.
STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION
TO STAY AND SET DEADLINE FOR JOINT
STATUS REPORT

18
19

Judge:

Hon. John A. Mendez

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Keith Welday
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
RISHI N. SHARMA (Cal. State Bar No. 239034)
PETER A. COOPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275300)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB

1
2

Plaintiff Keith Welday and defendant Rite Aid Corporation (“Rite Aid”), acting through their
respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

3

1.

This is one of 10 related actions pending before the Court: Keith Welday v. Rite Aid

4

Corp., 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB (“Welday”); Tom Bauser v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB

5

(“Bauser”); Rachel Chavez v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB (“Chavez”); Mark Jaeger v.

6

Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB (“Jaeger”); Bruce Kaufman v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-

7

01961 JAM-EFB (“Kaufman”); Chris Gonzalez v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB

8

(“Gonzalez”); Kathryn Von Kopp v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:14-CV-01965 JAM-EFB (“Von Kopp”); Kevin

9

Lewis v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB (“Lewis”); Jeff Wise v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:15-CV-

10

00622 JAM-EFB (“Wise”); and Paul Neumann v. Rite Aid Corp., 2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB

11

(“Neumann”) (collectively the “Related Actions”).

12

2.

On March 4, 2015, Rite Aid moved to stay Welday, Bauser, Chavez, Jaeger, Kaufman,

13

Gonzalez, and Von Kopp pending Romero v. Rite Aid Corp., U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal., No. CV 13-7720-

14

MWF (JEMx) (“Romero”), a putative class action in which the plaintiff alleges that Rite Aid

15

misclassified salaried Store Managers as exempt from the overtime pay and related requirements of

16

California law. Because the plaintiffs in Welday, Bauser, Chavez, Jaeger, Kaufman, Gonzalez, and Von

17

Kopp and the putative class in Romero are represented by the same counsel and plaintiffs in Welday,

18

Bauser, Chavez, Jaeger, Kaufman, Gonzalez, and Von Kopp are putative class member in Romero, Rite

19

Aid contended that the Court here should stay these proceedings as an effective case management tool

20

under its inherent discretionary authority. See Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55

21

(1936). (See, e.g., Welday ECF 26.) Rite Aid’s motions to stay remain pending before the Court,

22

though the hearings were vacated on April 16, 2015. (See, e.g., Welday ECF 34.) No such motions

23

were filed in Lewis, Wise, or Neumann.

24

3.

On March 2, 2015, separate counsel filed against Rite Aid a multi-plaintiff and putative

25

class action in Santa Clara County Superior Court entitled Chavez v. Rite Aid Corp., Santa Clara Super.

26

Ct. No. 1-15-CV-277313 (“Chavez II”) in which the plaintiffs allege that Rite Aid misclassified salaried

27

Store Managers as exempt from the overtime pay and related requirements of California law.

28

///

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB

1

4.

On April 15, 2015, the parties in Romero agreed to dismiss without prejudice the putative

2

class and representative claims in that action, which obviates Rite Aid’s motion to stay in Welday,

3

Bauser, Chavez, Jaeger, Kaufman, Gonzalez, and Von Kopp. Rite Aid also agrees not to move to stay

4

the Related Actions pending Chavez II.

5

5.

6

As such, the parties request that the Court:
a.

7

Jaeger, Kaufman, Gonzalez, and Von Kopp;

8

b.

9

Related Actions; and

11

13
14

set the parties’ deadline to file a joint status report for May 18, 2015, to coincide
with the parties’ current or requested deadline to file joint status reports in the

10

12

permit Rite Aid to withdraw its motions to stay in Welday, Bauser, Chavez,

c.
6.

enter similar orders on the parties’ stipulations in the Related Actions.

The parties also have agreed to set the deadline to exchange initial or supplemental

disclosures for May 18, 2015, in this action and the Related Actions.
Dated: April 16, 2015.

15

MATTHEW RIGHETTI
JOHN GLUGOSKI
MICHAEL RIGHETTI
RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C.

16
By:

17

Michael Righetti
Attorneys for Plaintiff Keith Welday

18
19

Dated: April 16, 2015.

20

JEFFREY D. WOHL
RISHI N. SHARMA
PETER A. COOPER
PAUL HASTINGS LLP

21
By:

22

Peter A. Cooper
Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM EFB

1

(Counsel of record listed on next page)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH WELDAY, an individual

12
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants

No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB
Related to Nos.
2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01957 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB;
2:14-CV-01965 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB;
2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB.
ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO
STAY AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR
JOINT STATUS REPORT

18
19

Judge:

Hon. John A. Mendez

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Keith Welday
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
RISHI N. SHARMA (Cal. State Bar No. 239034)
PETER A. COOPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275300)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB

1
2

On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

3

IT IS ORDERED that defendant Rite Aid Corporation’s motion to stay this action pending

4

Romero v. Rite Aid Corp., U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal., No. CV 13-7720-MWF (JEMx), is WITHDRAWN.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ deadlines to file their joint status report is set for

6

May 18, 2015, to coincide with the deadline to file joint status reports in the other actions related to this

7

action by the Court’s prior orders.

8

Dated: April 20, 2015.

9

/s/ John A. Mendez____________
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LEGAL_US_W # 81568887.4

ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO STAY
U.S.D.C., E.D. Cal., No. 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB