Von Kopp v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 40

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/19/2016 FINDING that the case denominated 2:14-cv-01946 JAM EFB is related to the actions denominated 1:15-cv-01872 JAM JLT, 2:15-cv-02594 JAM AC and 2:15-cv-02597 JAM CMK within the mea ning of Local Rule 123; ORDERING that the magistrate judge assignment in said related cases be reassigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; ORDERING that the caption on all documents filed henceforth in the reassigned cases be shown as 1:15-cv-01872 JAM EFB, 2:15-cv-02594 JAM EFB and 2:15-cv-02597 JAM EFB, respectively. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TOM BAUSER, an individual, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA, and ) AGNES MARCALLINO, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) 1 Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB RELATED CASE ORDER Related to Nos.: 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV—01957 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB 2:14-CV—01965 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01721 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB 1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB Case No.: 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT 1 11 ) Case No. 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-AC ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ROBERT L. HOLLANDSWORTH, an ) Case No. 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) 12 Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RAMON HURTADO, an individual, 13 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 14 2005). 15 judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 16 savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 17 the parties. 18 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 19 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 20 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 21 of the actions is effected. 22 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 23 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 24 Under the regular practice of this IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge assignment 25 in the actions denominated 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT, 2:15-CV-02594 26 JAM-AC and 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK be reassigned to Magistrate Judge 27 Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings. 28 caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown 2 Henceforth, the 1 as 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-EFB, 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-EFB and 2:15-CV-02597 2 JAM-EFB. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 22, 2016 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?