Bischoff, et al v. Brittain, et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that the parties are directed to meet and confer regarding a stipulated protective order. No later than 10/28/2015, the parties shall submit a stipulated protective order. I f the parties cannot agree on the terms of the protective order, no later than 10/28/2015, plaintiffs shall submit a proposed protective order and defendants shall file any objections thereto. The 44 motion to compel is GRANTED. All responsive documents shall be produced, without objection, no later than 11/6/2015. Discovery produced pursuant to this order shall be subject to the protective order. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SCOTT BISCHOFF, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1970 KJM CKD

v.

ORDER

SANDRA BRITTAIN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on October 14, 2015. Todd

17
18

Espinosa appeared for plaintiffs. David MacMillan appeared for defendants. Upon review of the

19

documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause

20

appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding a stipulated protective order. No

21
22

later than October 28, 2015, the parties shall submit a stipulated protective order. If the parties

23

cannot agree on the terms of the protective order, no later than October 28, 2015, plaintiffs shall

24

submit a proposed protective order and defendants shall file any objections thereto.
2. The motion to compel (ECF No. 44) is granted. All responsive documents shall be

25
26
27
28

produced, without objection,1 no later than November 6, 2015. If after diligent search, there are
1

The parties have previously agreed that documents exchanged between counsel of record for
defendants and clients for which a claim of attorney/client privilege is made need not be produced
1

1

no further documents responsive to a particular category, then defendants shall so state. Further

2

responses to interrogatories nos. 2 and 14 shall be provided, without objection, no later than

3

November 6, 2015.

4

3. Discovery produced pursuant to this order shall be subject to the protective order.

5

Documents produced responsive to document request nos. 9 and 10 shall be limited to attorneys-

6

eyes only and experts for statistical purposes.

7

Dated: October 15, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11

4 bischoff1970.oah

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

and no privilege log need be made of such withheld documents.
2