Bischoff, et al v. Brittain, et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/29/2014, nunc pro tunc to the time of submission of the parties' stipulation, VACATING the hearing and briefing dates set in the 5 Minute Order; GRANTING IN P ART the plaintiffs' 4 Motion as to the Temporary Restraining Order; ALLOWING the plaintiffs to supplement their moving papers by 9/5/2014; ORDERING the defendants to file a memorandum in opposition to the 4 Motion as to the Preliminary Injun ction by 9/12/2014; ORDERING the plaintiffs to file any reply memorandum by 9/19/2014; SETTING the Motion Hearing on the 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for 9/26/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; ORDERING that this order remain in effect until dissolved by the Court. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
Todd Espinosa (SBN 209591)
Law Office of Todd Espinosa
2000 Broadway Street, Suite 333
Redwood City, California 94063
650-241-3873 telephone
650-409-2550 facsimile
tie@toddespinosalaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and Leron Dempsey
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
SCOTT BISCHOFF and LERON DEMPSEY,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
SANDRA BRITTAIN; KEITH JOHNSON; and
RZM INVESTMENTS ENTERPRISE, LLC,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING
SCHEDULE ON PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and Leron Dempsey (referred to herein as
1
2
“Plaintiffs”) rent and reside in apartments at the Birchwood Gardens apartment complex at 1225
3
Bell Street in Sacramento County, California that is owned and/or managed by the Defendants in
4
this action (referred to herein as “Defendants”);
WHEREAS, on July 29, 2014, Defendants notified Plaintiffs of Defendants’ termination
5
6
of Plaintiffs’ tenancies;
WHEREAS, on August 25, 2014, Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this action alleging,
7
8
among other things, that Defendants’ termination of their tenancies at Birchwood Gardens is part
9
of a discriminatory housing practice that is contrary to the federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C.
10
§ 3604 and 3617, and a violation of the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code
11
§ 51 and 51.2;
12
13
WHEREAS, Defendants’ termination of Plaintiffs’ tenancies is effective August 31,
2014;
14
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2014, Plaintiffs moved the Court for a temporary restraining
15
order and preliminary injunction to prevent the termination of their tenancies and served copies
16
of their motion papers on Defendants’ counsel, thereby providing notice to Defendants;
17
WHEREAS, the Court has set the matter of Plaintiffs’ moved for temporary restraining
18
order for hearing on August 29, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. and directed that Defendants’ opposition
19
papers be filed by the close of business on August 28, 2014;
20
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to avoid the potentially duplicative expenditure of counsel’s
21
and the Court’s time and resources on contested motion practice related to both a temporary
22
restraining order and preliminary injunction; and
23
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Parties therefore agree to the issuance of the temporary restraining order
and the setting of a briefing and hearing schedule on the moved for preliminary injunction;
The Parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby STIPULATE to the immediate
issuance of the following order by this Court:
1.
The hearing and briefing dates set in the Court’s August 27, 2014 minute order
(Docket No. 5) are hereby taken off calendar.
2.
Plaintiffs’ motion filed on August 27, 2014 (Docket No. 4) is granted in part as to
the temporary restraining order.
3.
Without making any determination regarding the lawfulness of Defendants’
10
conduct at this time, the Thirty-Day Notices of Termination of Tenancy dated July 29, 2014 and
11
the upcoming August 31, 2014 termination of Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and Leron Dempsey’s
12
tenancies in their apartments at the Birchwood Gardens apartment complex shall not be effective
13
until the Court grants relief of this order.
14
4.
Pending further order of the Court, and without prejudice to Defendants seeking
15
relief from this order in event of any serious rental agreement violation, Defendants Sandra
16
Brittain, Keith Johnson and RZM Investments Enterprise, LLC shall allow Plaintiffs Scott
17
Bischoff and Leron Dempsey to remain in and use and enjoy their apartments at the Birchwood
18
Gardens apartment complex, so long as Plaintiffs continue to pay their monthly rent.
19
5.
Pending further order of the Court, and without prejudice to Defendants seeking
20
relief from this order in event of any serious rental agreement violation, Defendants Sandra
21
Brittain, Keith Johnson and RZM Investments Enterprise, LLC and anyone acting with them or
22
on their behalf shall take no steps to displace, evict or remove Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and Leron
23
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Page 2
1
Dempsey and shall not file any actions for possession of Plaintiffs’ apartments, including any
2
unlawful detainer actions, so long as Plaintiffs continue to pay their monthly rent.
6.
3
Pending further order of the Court, and without prejudice to Defendants seeking
4
relief from this order in event of any serious rental agreement violation, Plaintiff Scott Bischoff
5
shall continue to pay the monthly rent for his apartment in the amount of $665.00 per month as
6
the rent comes due so long as he remains in his apartment. Plaintiff Leron Dempsey shall
7
continue to pay the monthly rent for his apartment in the amount of $680.00 per month as the
8
rent comes due so long as he remains in his apartment. Payment of rent shall be delivered to the
9
Birchwood Gardens on-site manager’s office.
10
7.
Defendants may file with the Court a memorandum in opposition to the moved
11
for preliminary injunction no later than September 12, 2014. Plaintiffs may file a reply to
12
Defendants’ memorandum no later than September 19, 2014. A hearing on the moved for
13
preliminary injunction shall be held on September 26, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.
8.
14
Because, under the express terms of this order, Defendants will continue to
15
receive rent for Plaintiffs’ apartments at the current rate, Defendants will suffer no meaningful
16
costs or damages related to this order. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are not required to give security or
17
bond under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
18
////
19
////
20
////
21
////
22
////
23
////
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Page 3
1
9.
This order shall remain in effect until dissolved by the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
Date: August 28, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
_______/s/ Todd Espinosa________________
Todd Espinosa
Law Office of Todd Espinosa
2000 Broadway Street, Suite 333
Redwood City, California 94063
tie@toddespinosalaw.com
650-241-3873 telephone
650-409-2550 facsimile
Attorney for Plaintiffs Scott Bischoff and
Leron Dempsey
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by
a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
LAW OFFICE OF TODD ESPINOSA /s/ Todd Espinosa
11
Date: August 28, 2014
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
_______/s/ Richard M. Watts, Jr.
Richard M. Watts, Jr.
Millstone Peterson & Watts, LLP
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
RWatts@mpwlaw.net
Ph: (916) 780-8222 x102
Fx: (916) 780-8775
Attorney for Defendants Sandra Brittain, Keith
Johnson and RZM Investments Enterprise, LLC
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by
a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP /s/ Richard M. Watts, Jr.
19
20
21
22
23
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Page 4
1
2
3
ORDER
Should plaintiffs wish to supplement their moving papers, they shall do so by September
5, 2014. The briefing schedule set forth above is otherwise approved.
4
The parties’ stipulation is approved.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: August 29, 2014.
Nunc pro tunc to the
time of submission
of the parties’ stipulation.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
BISCHOFF, et al. v. BRITTAIN, et al., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01970-KJM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Page 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?