Villanueva v. First Federal Bank of California et al

Filing 9

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/16/2015 ORDERING Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court $250.00 in monetary sanctions based on plaintiff's failure to appear at th e status conference and failure to comply with court orders; Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall also show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the cas e and failure to comply with court orders; Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue the action at this time, he may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) within 14 days of this order. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRISOSTOMO P. VILLANUEVA, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-2012-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Crisostomo Villanueva, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action 19 alleging wrongful foreclosure and other related claims on August 29, 2014, and paid the filing 20 fee. (ECF No. 1.) That same day, the court issued an “Order Setting Status Conference.” (ECF 21 No. 6.) The order directed plaintiff to “complete service of process on defendants named in the 22 complaint within 120 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is cautioned that this action may 23 be dismissed if service of process is not accomplished within 120 days from the date that the 24 complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).” (Id. at 1.) 25 That same order set a status (pre-trial scheduling) conference for January 15, 2015, at 26 10:00 a.m., and stated that “[a]ll parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without 27 counsel.” (ECF No. 6 at 2.) The order also directed the parties to file a status report addressing 28 specific topics no later than seven (7) days prior to the status conference. (Id. at 2-3.) The order 1 1 specifically cautioned that “[f]ailing to obey federal or local rules, or [an] order of this court, may 2 result in dismissal of this action. This court will construe pro se pleadings liberally, but pro se 3 litigants must comply with the procedural rules.” (Id. at 3.) 4 No status report was filed prior to the January 15, 2015 status conference, and plaintiff 5 failed to appear at the status conference. Additionally, the court’s records indicate that no 6 defendant has yet appeared in this case, and there has been no docket activity since plaintiff filed 7 an election to decline the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes on September 15, 8 2014. (ECF No. 7.) Such inactivity strongly suggests that plaintiff has not yet served defendants 9 with process, even though the 120-day period for service of process has now expired. Based on plaintiff’s numerous failures, the court has considered whether the action should 10 11 be dismissed at this juncture. Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff’s pro se status and the court’s 12 general preference to resolve actions on their merits, the court first attempts lesser sanctions. 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 14 1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court $250.00 15 in monetary sanctions based on plaintiff’s failure to appear at the status conference 16 and failure to comply with court orders. 17 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall also show cause in writing why 18 this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) 19 based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the case and failure to comply with court 20 orders. 21 3. Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue the action at this time, he may 22 instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) within fourteen (14) days of this order. 24 4. Failure to pay the monetary sanctions imposed and file a written response to the order 25 to show cause by the required deadline, OR file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 2 1 action by the required deadline, will result in a recommendation that the action be 2 dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 16, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?