Dicey v. Hanks et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/27/15 ordering that within 21 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to defendant Statti's motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BERLAN LYNELL DICEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

W. HANKS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On February 10, 2015, defendant Statti filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff

18

was granted an additional forty-five days to oppose the motion. ECF No. 22. Forty-five days

19

have passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendant Statti’s motion to dismiss.

20

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days after the filing

21

date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to defendant Statti’s motion to

22

dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a

23

recommendation that the claims against defendant Statti be dismissed without prejudice for

24

failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

25

DATED: May 27, 2015

26
27
28