Bauer v. Macomber et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/23/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to suspend the filing fee and transfer his application for in forma pauperis status upon filing of a new case 20 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this action without prejudice 20 is granted pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL RAYMOND BAUER, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-2028 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for 19 all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 6. 20 By order filed January 13, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 21 to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff’s first request for extension of 22 his time to file an amended complaint was granted on March 10, 2015. ECF No. 14. On March 23 25, 2015, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. 24 ECF No. 18. The time to file an amended complaint passed and plaintiff did not file an amended 25 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. On May 18, 2015, the court issued an 26 order advising plaintiff that if he did not file an amended complaint within thirty days, this action 27 would be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 19. Plaintiff has 28 now filed a motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss the case so that he can re-file his lawsuit once 1 1 he is released from prison and no longer subject to the restrictions of the Prison Litigation Reform 2 Act. ECF No. 20. He also requests that his filing fee in this case be suspended and his 3 application for in forma pauperis status be transferred once he files his new case. Id. 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action 5 without prejudice without an order of the court if the opposing party has not yet filed an answer 6 or motion for summary judgment or a stipulation of dismissal has been signed by all parties who 7 have appeared. Since defendants have not yet been served, and have therefore not filed an answer 8 or motion for summary judgment, it was not necessary for plaintiff to request an order dismissing 9 the case. The court will therefore grant plaintiff’s motion and dismiss this action without 10 prejudice. However, plaintiff’s request to suspend the filing fee in this case and transfer his 11 application for in forma pauperis will be denied. Plaintiff’s decision to exercise his right to 12 voluntarily dismiss this case does not excuse him from the filing fee. If plaintiff seeks in forma 13 pauperis status in any subsequently filed action, he should complete an application for such status 14 when he files the complaint. 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERD that 16 1. Plaintiff’s motion to suspend the filing fee and transfer his application for in forma 17 18 19 pauperis status upon filing of a new case (ECF No. 20) is denied. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice (ECF No. 20) is granted. DATED: June 23, 2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?