Gilchrist v. Yolo County District Attorney Office et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA J. GILCHRIST, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-2040 DAD P v. ORDER YOLO COUNTY DISTRCT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE et al., Defendants. 16 17 By order filed March 30, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 21 22 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1 23 Dated: May 15, 2015 24 25 DAD:9 gilc2040.fta 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 3) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?