Johnson v. Patel
Filing
45
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/02/17 SANCTIONING Mr. Welch in the amount of $250, payable to the Clerk of the Court within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-02052-KJM-DB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MIKE PATEL, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Defense counsel Michael D. Welch moved to withdraw as counsel, contending he
18
has lost all contact with his client, Mike Patel. ECF No. 41 (filed June 16, 2017). But the
19
applicable local rule mandates that before any such withdrawal, the attorney must “provide an
20
affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts made
21
to notify the client of the motion to withdraw.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Neither Mr. Welch’s
22
declaration nor his motion provides his client’s last known address and instead describes
23
generally unanswered e-mails, phone calls and visits. See ECF Nos. 41, 41-1. Finding the detail
24
insufficient, the court ordered Mr. Welch to file a supplemental rule-compliant brief. ECF No. 43
25
(issued Aug. 22, 2017). Receiving no response, the court ordered Mr. Welch to show cause
26
within seven days why he should not be sanctioned $250 for his non-compliance. ECF No. 44
27
(issued Sept. 19, 2017). The deadline has lapsed and Mr. Welch has yet to file any response.
28
1
1
2
3
4
Accordingly, the court SANCTIONS Mr. Welch in the amount of $250, payable to
the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 2, 2017.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?