Johnson v. Patel

Filing 5

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/20/14 ORDERING The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on November 24, 2014, is continued to February 9, 2015 at 9:00 a .m. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. Further, Plaintiff is notified that failure to serve Defendant Mike Patel with process within the 120 day period may result in the unserved de fendant and/or this action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before January 5, 2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for the defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 Scott Johnson, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. Mike Patel, and Does 1-10, 10 No. 2:14-cv-02052-GEB-DAD ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE Defendants. 11 12 The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled 13 for hearing on November 24, 2014, is continued to February 9, 14 2015 at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed no later 15 than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. 16 Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the 17 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant 18 Mike Patel with process within the 120 day period prescribed in 19 that Rule may result in the unserved defendant and/or this action 20 being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before January 5, 21 2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for the defendant or 22 a sufficient explanation why service was not completed within 23 Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: November 20, 2014 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?