Johnson v. Patel
Filing
5
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/20/14 ORDERING The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on November 24, 2014, is continued to February 9, 2015 at 9:00 a .m. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. Further, Plaintiff is notified that failure to serve Defendant Mike Patel with process within the 120 day period may result in the unserved de fendant and/or this action being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before January 5, 2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for the defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
Scott Johnson,
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
v.
Mike Patel, and Does 1-10,
10
No. 2:14-cv-02052-GEB-DAD
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M)
NOTICE
Defendants.
11
12
The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled
13
for hearing on November 24, 2014, is continued to February 9,
14
2015 at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed no later
15
than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference.
16
Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the
17
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant
18
Mike Patel with process within the 120 day period prescribed in
19
that Rule may result in the unserved defendant and/or this action
20
being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before January 5,
21
2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for the defendant or
22
a sufficient explanation why service was not completed within
23
Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
November 20, 2014
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?