Martinelli v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. et al

Filing 33

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/1/2014 ORDERING that cases 2:14-cv-02055 MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02072 MCE-KJN, 2:14-cv-02105 TLN-EFB, 2:14-cv-02130 WBS-DAD, 2:14-cv-02571 KJM-EFB are RELATED and REASSIGNED to Chief J udge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are hereby VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is to issue an Order Requiring Joint Status Report. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 JOANN N. MARTINELLI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, 16 MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. PAUL SAUSMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 No. 2:14-cv-02072 MCE-KJN Plaintiff, 17 18 RELATED CASE ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-02055 MCE-KJN v. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 SSUCHIA CHEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 23 24 25 26 27 No. 2:14-cv-02105 TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants 28 1 1 KENT OLDHAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 2:14-cv-02130 WBS-DAD 2 Plaintiff, 3 v. 4 5 MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., 6 Defendants 7 8 9 SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P., AND SPECIAL SITUATIONS CAYMAN FUND, L.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-02571 KJM-EFB v. MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants 14 15 The Court has received the Notice of Related Case filed on November 4, 2014. 16 Examination of the above-entitled civil actions reveals that these actions are 17 related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve 18 many of the same defendants and are based on the same or similar claims, the same 19 property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the same questions of law, 20 and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. 21 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a 22 substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties. The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely 23 24 has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the 25 action is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally 26 assigned to the district judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was 27 assigned. 28 /// 2 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned actions are reassigned 2 to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all 3 further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are hereby 4 VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is to issue an Order Requiring Joint Status Report. 5 Further, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 6 follows: 7 1. Chen v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., et al., No. 2:14-cv-2105-MCE-KJN 8 2. Oldham v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., et al., No. 2:14-cv-02130-MCE-KJN 3. Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. et al. v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., et al., No. 2:14-cv-02571-MCE-KJN 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?