Walker v. Whiting et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 44 Motion to modify scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/01/15. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN WALKER,

12

No. 2:14-cv-2064 TLN CKD P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WHITING, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff has filed a motion to modify the scheduling order so as to serve discovery

18

requests on defendant Lee. (ECF No. 44.) As this defendant has not yet been served with the

19

operative complaint, plaintiff’s motion will be denied without prejudice to renewal. If and when

20

service is effected on defendant Lee, the court will modify the discovery schedule as needed with

21

regard to this defendant.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling

23

order (ECF No. 44) is denied without prejudice to renewal.

24

Dated: June 1, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

2/walk2064.mod