Walker v. Whiting et al
Filing
52
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/14/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed against defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). All parties are to b ear their own costs and attorney's fees. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Lee, and this case closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/15/2015 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN WALKER,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2064 TLN CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
WHITING, et al.,
15
ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
On August 17, 2015, plaintiff and defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera
18
stipulated that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement. (ECF
19
No. 50; see ECF No. 49.)
On August 20, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to notify the court within fourteen days
20
21
whether he also intended to dismiss this action as to defendant Lee, who had not yet been served
22
with the complaint. (ECF No. 51; see ECF No. 45.) As plaintiff has not timely responded, the
23
undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed as to Lee pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
24
41(b).
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed against defendants
26
Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). All parties
27
are to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
28
////
1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to
defendant Lee, and this case closed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that
8
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
9
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: September 14, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2 / walk2064.59c
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?