Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting in full 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/15; and this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento. CASE CLOSED. (Certified copy of this order sent to state court. ) (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL CLARK,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:14-cv-2066-KJM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil action. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On April 3, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were

21

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.

24

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed

27

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

28

the proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 3, 2015, are adopted in full;

3

2. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the

4
5
6

County of Sacramento; and
3. The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate all pending motions.
DATED: June 11, 2015.

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2