Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/27/15 ordering the 02/25/15 order directing plaintiff to submit service documents for Andris and Toliver 9 is hereby vacated. Plaintiff's motions concerning the submission of service documents 17 and 18 are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASIR MEHMOOD, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief against two Sacramento County Jail officials have 19 been mooted by his transfer. (See ECF No. 12.) Thus, plaintiff has been granted leave to file a 20 Second Amended Complaint (SAC). (Id.) 21 As there is currently no viable complaint, the court will vacate its order directing plaintiff 22 to submit service documents for defendants named in the First Amended Complaint. (See ECF 23 Nos. 9 & 18.) When the court screens the SAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), it will order 24 service on one or more defendants, if appropriate. 25 Plaintiff is once again advised that he cannot make piecemeal amendments or “requests” 26 to add elements to a complaint. (See ECF No. 18.) Rather, any Second Amended Complaint 27 must be “complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading.” (ECF No. 5 at 7, citing L.R. 28 1 1 220.) 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The February 25, 2015 order directing plaintiff to submit service documents for Andris 4 5 and Toliver (ECF No. 9) is hereby vacated; and 2. Plaintiff’s motions concerning the submission of service documents (ECF Nos. 17 & 6 18) are denied as moot. 7 Dated: March 27, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2 / mehm2075.ord_2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?