Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/27/15 ordering the 02/25/15 order directing plaintiff to submit service documents for Andris and Toliver 9 is hereby vacated. Plaintiff's motions concerning the submission of service documents 17 and 18 are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YASIR MEHMOOD,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief against two Sacramento County Jail officials have
19
been mooted by his transfer. (See ECF No. 12.) Thus, plaintiff has been granted leave to file a
20
Second Amended Complaint (SAC). (Id.)
21
As there is currently no viable complaint, the court will vacate its order directing plaintiff
22
to submit service documents for defendants named in the First Amended Complaint. (See ECF
23
Nos. 9 & 18.) When the court screens the SAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), it will order
24
service on one or more defendants, if appropriate.
25
Plaintiff is once again advised that he cannot make piecemeal amendments or “requests”
26
to add elements to a complaint. (See ECF No. 18.) Rather, any Second Amended Complaint
27
must be “complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading.” (ECF No. 5 at 7, citing L.R.
28
1
1
220.)
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The February 25, 2015 order directing plaintiff to submit service documents for Andris
4
5
and Toliver (ECF No. 9) is hereby vacated; and
2. Plaintiff’s motions concerning the submission of service documents (ECF Nos. 17 &
6
18) are denied as moot.
7
Dated: March 27, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2 / mehm2075.ord_2
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?