Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/14/2015 DENYING, as moot, plaintiff's 25 motion for an extension ; and DENYING plaintiff's 26 motion for emergency injunctive relief. Plaintiff may only file the following doc uments: a. One second amended complaint; b. One dispositive motion, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; c. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly ti tled as such); d. Only one non-dispositive motion pending at any time, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and e. One set of objections to any future findings and recommendations. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YASIR MEHMOOD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P
v.
ORDER
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action
17
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 31, 2015, the court granted plaintiff 90 days to file a
19
second amended complaint, noting that no further extensions of time will be granted. (ECF No.
20
22.) Thus plaintiff’s subsequent motion for a 90-day extension of time (ECF No. 25) will be
21
denied.
Plaintiff has also filed a motion for “emergency injunctive relief” with regard to his jail
22
23
diet. (ECF No. 26.) As there currently is no operative complaint in this action, plaintiff’s request
24
for injunctive relief is inapposite and will be denied.
Moreover, plaintiff’s filing of frivolous motions is a burden on this court and impedes the
25
26
proper prosecution of this action. Plaintiff’s future filings shall therefore be limited as set forth
27
below.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 25) is denied as moot per the order
3
issued March 31, 2015;
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for emergency injunctive relief (ECF No. 26) is denied; and
5
3. Plaintiff may only file the following documents:
6
a. One second amended complaint;
7
b. One dispositive motion, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities
8
in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition;
9
c. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as such);
10
d. Only one non-dispositive motion pending at any time. Plaintiff is limited to
11
one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any
12
opposition; and
13
14
e. One set of objections to any future findings and recommendations.
Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being stricken
15
from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
16
Dated: April 14, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 / mehm2075.limit
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?