Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/14/2015 DENYING, as moot, plaintiff's 25 motion for an extension ; and DENYING plaintiff's 26 motion for emergency injunctive relief. Plaintiff may only file the following doc uments: a. One second amended complaint; b. One dispositive motion, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; c. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly ti tled as such); d. Only one non-dispositive motion pending at any time, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and e. One set of objections to any future findings and recommendations. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASIR MEHMOOD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P v. ORDER U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 17 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 31, 2015, the court granted plaintiff 90 days to file a 19 second amended complaint, noting that no further extensions of time will be granted. (ECF No. 20 22.) Thus plaintiff’s subsequent motion for a 90-day extension of time (ECF No. 25) will be 21 denied. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for “emergency injunctive relief” with regard to his jail 22 23 diet. (ECF No. 26.) As there currently is no operative complaint in this action, plaintiff’s request 24 for injunctive relief is inapposite and will be denied. Moreover, plaintiff’s filing of frivolous motions is a burden on this court and impedes the 25 26 proper prosecution of this action. Plaintiff’s future filings shall therefore be limited as set forth 27 below. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 25) is denied as moot per the order 3 issued March 31, 2015; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for emergency injunctive relief (ECF No. 26) is denied; and 5 3. Plaintiff may only file the following documents: 6 a. One second amended complaint; 7 b. One dispositive motion, limited to one memorandum of points and authorities 8 in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; 9 c. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as such); 10 d. Only one non-dispositive motion pending at any time. Plaintiff is limited to 11 one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any 12 opposition; and 13 14 e. One set of objections to any future findings and recommendations. Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being stricken 15 from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 16 Dated: April 14, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 / mehm2075.limit 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?