Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/30/15 denying 39 Motion for Extension of time and denying 40 Motion for injunctive relief. This action is dismissed without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YASIR MEHMOOD,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-2075 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
U. S. MARSHALS SERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a federal pretrial detainee, commenced this civil rights action in September 2014.
18
On August 21, 2015, the undersigned dismissed the Second Amended Complaint and granted
19
plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint that conformed to federal pleading
20
requirements. (ECF No. 35.) On September 10, 2015, the court granted plaintiff an extension of
21
time until December 15, 2015 to file a Third Amended Complaint, stating that no further
22
extensions of time would be granted. (ECF No. 37.)
23
To date, plaintiff has not filed a Third Amended Complaint. Rather, he seeks an
24
additional, six-month extension of time to do so. (ECF No. 39.) The court does not find good
25
cause to vacate its September 10, 2015 order.
26
Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings
27
in this action. (ECF No. 4.) As he has failed to timely amend, the undersigned will dismiss this
28
action without prejudice.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 39) is denied;
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 40) is denied; and
4
3. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
5
Dated: December 30, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
2/mehm2075.fta
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?