Aubin Industries, Inc. v. Caster Concepts, Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/20/2015 ORDERING 49 Plaintiff Aubin Industries, Inc.'s Reply Claim Construction Brief shall be allowed to exceed the 10 page maximum by 6 pages for a total allowable length of 16 pages; Defendant will, however, be permitted to file a sur-reply brief not longer than 5 pages in length not later than 8/31/2015. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 COLT / SINGER / BEA LLP Benjamin L. Singer (Bar. No. 264295) bsinger@coltsinger.com Katie K. Erno (Bar No. 264748) kerno@coltsinger.com Joseph C. Gabaeff (Bar No. 255054) jgabaeff@coltsinger.com 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1950 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 500-6080 Facsimile: (415) 500-6080 Attorneys for Plaintiff Aubin Industries, Inc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 AUBIN INDUSTRIES, INC., 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 CASTER CONCEPTS, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02082-MCE-CKD ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AUBIN INDUSTRIES, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS ON ITS REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF 17 18 THE COURT, having considered Plaintiff Aubin Industries, Inc.’s Ex Parte Application to 19 Exceed Page Limits on its Reply Claim Construction Brief and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor; 20 Plaintiff Aubin Industries, Inc.’s Reply Claim Construction Brief shall be allowed to exceed 21 the ten (10) page maximum by six (6) pages for a total allowable length of sixteen (16) pages. 22 Defendant Caster Concepts, Inc., will, however, be permitted to file a sur-reply brief not longer than 23 five (5) pages in length not later than Monday, August 31, 2015. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2015 26 27 28 -1- ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AUBIN INDUSTRIES, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS ON ITS REPLY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02082-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?