Clearplex Corporation v. Bray Group, et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/5/2014. Since this case is not ready to be scheduled, the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 1/26/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

CLEARPLEX CORPORATION,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

No. 2:14-cv-02099-GEB-AC

v.
BRAY GROUP, a/k/a BRAY, a/k/a
THE BRAY GROUP, INC., a/k/a
BRAY GROUP INC.; and ALAN
BRAY

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
ORDER

Defendants.

14
15
16

This case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the

17

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on

18

December 15, 2014 is continued to January 26, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

19

A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14)

20

days prior to the Status Conference, in which the parties shall

21

address all pertinent subjects set forth in Local Rule 240, and

22

propose

23

patent

24

propose in the joint status report, a schedule for:

25

a

claim

construction

infringement

claims.

schedule

concerning

Specifically,

the

Plaintiff’s

parties

shall

The exchange of each party’s proposed terms for claim

26

construction;

27

The

28

exchange

of

each

construction and supporting evidence;
1

party’s

proposed

claim

1
2

The filing of a Joint Claim Construction Statement,
after the parties seek to resolve disputes;

3
4

The filing of opening and responding claim construction
briefs and supporting evidence; and

5

A claim construction hearing.

6

The

parties

shall

also

address

in

the

joint

status

7

report the necessity for and/or proposed scheduling of a tutorial

8

to present a short summary and explanation of the technology at

9

issue.

10

Dated:

December 5, 2014

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2