Clearplex Corporation v. Bray Group, et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/5/2014. Since this case is not ready to be scheduled, the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 1/26/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CLEARPLEX CORPORATION, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-02099-GEB-AC v. BRAY GROUP, a/k/a BRAY, a/k/a THE BRAY GROUP, INC., a/k/a BRAY GROUP INC.; and ALAN BRAY STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER Defendants. 14 15 16 This case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the 17 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on 18 December 15, 2014 is continued to January 26, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. 19 A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) 20 days prior to the Status Conference, in which the parties shall 21 address all pertinent subjects set forth in Local Rule 240, and 22 propose 23 patent 24 propose in the joint status report, a schedule for: 25 a claim construction infringement claims. schedule concerning Specifically, the Plaintiff’s parties shall The exchange of each party’s proposed terms for claim 26 construction; 27 The 28 exchange of each construction and supporting evidence; 1 party’s proposed claim 1 2 The filing of a Joint Claim Construction Statement, after the parties seek to resolve disputes; 3 4 The filing of opening and responding claim construction briefs and supporting evidence; and 5 A claim construction hearing. 6 The parties shall also address in the joint status 7 report the necessity for and/or proposed scheduling of a tutorial 8 to present a short summary and explanation of the technology at 9 issue. 10 Dated: December 5, 2014 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?