Carr v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/2016 ORDERING 52 that upon reconsideration, the Order 48 of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

LEROY CARR,

10
11
12
13

No. 2:14-cv-2110 JAM CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

On June 10, 2016, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

16

order filed May 27, 2016, denying plaintiff’s motion for hearing as moot. Defendants have

17

responded to the motion, and plaintiff has filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 53 & 54.) Pursuant to E.D.

18

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

19

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

20

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

22

magistrate judge filed May 27, 2016 is affirmed.

23

DATED: August 10, 2016

24

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28
1