Carr v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/28/18 VACATING 12/27/18 91 Discovery and Scheduling Order; within 30 days, the parties shall confer and submit a joint status report and proposed scheduling order that briefly sets out their views on the matters outlined in the order. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEROY CARR,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2110 JAM CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

In light of the appearance of counsel on plaintiff’s behalf and pursuant to the provisions of

18

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 and Local Rule 240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

19

the December 27, 2018 discovery and scheduling order (ECF No. 91) is vacated and within thirty

20

days of the filing of this order, the parties shall confer and submit a joint status report and

21

proposed scheduling order that briefly sets out their views on the following matters:

22

1. Service of process;

23

2. Possible joinder of additional parties;

24

3. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

25

4. Jurisdiction and venue;

26

5. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

27

6. The deadline for initial disclosures. If any party objects to the appropriateness of

28

initial disclosures, an explanation must be provided;
1

1

7. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof;

2

8. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cutoff dates for discovery and law

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

and motion and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;
9. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative
simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings;
10. Whether this matter is to be tried before this court or the district court. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c);
11. Whether the counsel will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and
waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his/her so acting, or whether they prefer to have a
Settlement Conference before another judge;
12. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter.
Dated: December 28, 2018

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15

13:carr2110.40.aty

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2