McNeal v. Unknown

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 6 filing, construed as a motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has 30 days to comply with the 9/23/2014 order; and the 5 order to show cause is DISCHARGED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON McNEAL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2121 KJN P v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed September 23, 2014, plaintiff was directed to file, within thirty days, a 18 complaint or a petition and to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) On September 23, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within 20 fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with 21 the prior order. On November 5, 2014, plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause 22 stating that he submitted his complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis to prison 23 officials on October 23, 2014, but does not know why they have not yet been mailed to the court. 24 Plaintiff states he will immediately inquire of the librarian and mail room. 25 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Plaintiff’s filing (ECF No. 6) is construed as a motion for an extension of time and is 27 granted; 28 //// 1 2 3 4 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to comply with the September 23, 2014 order; and 3. The order to show cause (ECF No. 5) is discharged. Dated: November 10, 2014 5 6 /mcne2121.36 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?