McNeal v. Unknown

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/18/15 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VERNON MCNEAL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2121 KJN P

v.

ORDER

UNKNOWN,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

17
18

§ 636(c). By order filed September 23, 2014, plaintiff’s initial filing, a letter, was denied, and

19

thirty days leave to file a civil rights complaint or petition for writ of habeas corpus was granted.

20

Thirty days passed, and plaintiff did not comply with the order. On October 29, 2014, plaintiff

21

was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff

22

filed a response to the order to show cause, which was construed as a request for extension of

23

time. On November 10, 2014, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to comply

24

with the September 23, 2014 order. More than thirty days have now expired, and plaintiff has not

25

filed a civil rights complaint or habeas corpus petition, or otherwise responded to the court’s

26

order.

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

2

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

Dated: March 18, 2015

4
5
/mcne2121.fta

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2