Lorenzana v. Thompson

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/16/2015 DISMISSING this action. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIAN LORENZANA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2127-EFB P v. ORDER THOMPSON, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On September 9, 2015, the postal service returned mail directed to plaintiff as 19 “undeliverable, not in custody.” A party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of his 20 21 current address. E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a plaintiff is returned by the postal 22 service and plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of her 23 current address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. 24 More than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and plaintiff has not 25 notified the court of his current address. 26 ///// 27 28 1 This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent. E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k). 1 1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(b). 3 Dated: November 16, 2015. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?