Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER 21 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/18/2015. Defendant's due date for responding to 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 7/13/2015. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DONNA W. ANDERSON, SBN PA 46355 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8930 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Donna.W.Anderson@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 LAWRENCE THOMAS, 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 21 22 Defendant. ) Case No. 2:14-cv-2129 AC ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 24 The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that Defendant’s due 25 date for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended 28 26 days to July 13, 2015. 27 This is Defendant’s second request for an extension of time. This extension 28 is needed due to Defense counsel’s illness. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose the 1 1 extension and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be extended accordingly. 2 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Dated: June 15, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 6 7 8 By: 9 10 11 /s/ Donna W. Anderson DONNA W. ANDERSON Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 Dated: June 15, 2015 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/ Peter Brixie* PETER BRIXIE Attorney for Plaintiff Lawrence Thomas (*By email authorization on 6/15/15) 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 23 Date: June 18, 2015 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?