Teleten v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/10/15: Plaintiff shall have 14 days after Defendant files the supplemental record to file a Supplemental Brief. All other deadlines in the Court's October 7, 2014 Scheduling Order remain the same. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
ELLINOR R. CODER, CSBN 258258
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8955
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Ellinor.Coder@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
NADEZHDA TELETEN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
vs.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-02140-EFB
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Plaintiff Nadezhda Teleten (Plaintiff) filed her Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 15)
on May 11, 2015. Her motion raised the issue that the Administrative Record did not contain a
21
22
decision by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on Plaintiff’s prior claim for disability benefits;
23
the inclusion of this document is necessary because the ALJ in the current claim for disability
24
benefits gave the prior decision preclusive effect. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security
25
(Defendant) developed a supplemental record, which is in transit from the east coast and will be
26
filed and served as soon as it arrives at the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Defendant apologizes to
27
28
Plaintiff and the Court for this issue.
Stip. to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:14-cv-02140-EFB
1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, subject to the Court’s approval, that
2
Plaintiff shall have an additional 14 days to file a Supplemental Brief in support of her Motion
3
for Summary Judgment after Defendant files and serves the supplemental record. Plaintiff’s
4
Supplemental Brief will pertain only to new issues that arise from the supplemental record.
5
6
Plaintiff may also amend any argument in her Motion for Summary Judgment arising from the
7
exclusion of the prior ALJ decision from the record. There is good cause for this extension
8
because Defendant needs a brief period to file and serve the supplemental record, and Plaintiff
9
should have an opportunity to respond.
10
All other deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 6) remain the same. Thus,
11
12
13
Defendant will respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 30 days after Plaintiff files
her Supplemental Brief (Dkt. 6, ¶5), and Plaintiff shall have 21 days to reply (Dkt. 6, ¶6).
14
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 9, 2015
/s/___Jesse S. Kaplan*___
JESSE S. KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
*Authorized via e-mail on June 9, 2015
Dated: June 9, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
/s/ Ellinor R. Coder
ELLINOR R. CODER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
26
Attorneys for Defendant
24
By:
27
28
Stip. to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:14-cv-02140-EFB
2
1
ORDER
2
3
The requested extension of time for Defendant to file the supplemental record and for
4
Plaintiff to file a Supplemental Brief is granted. Plaintiff shall have 14 days after Defendant files
5
the supplemental record to file a Supplemental Brief. All other deadlines in the Court’s October
6
7, 2014 Scheduling Order remain the same.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 10, 2015.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:14-cv-02140-EFB
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?