Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/17/15 ORDERING that the time for filing of plaintiff's reply is EXTENDED to 5/18/15. (Kastilahn, A)
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
CSBN 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
Email:
541-419-0074
jaf@forslundlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TUNI DEE HERNANDEZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Comm’r of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant,
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-02142-CKD
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE REPLY
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to
extend the time 30 days to May 18, 2015, for filing of Plaintiff’s Reply, in accordance with the
Court’s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension for her Reply. This
extension is requested because Plaintiff’s counsel is experiencing a backlog in her workload that
she is in the process of resolving.
Hernandez v. Colvin
E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02142-CKD
Stipulation and Proposed Order
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: April 15, 2015
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: April 16, 2015
BENJAMIN J. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
/s/ Francesco Paulo Benadvides
FRANCESCO PAULO BENAVIDES
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
Attorney for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED
Dated: April 17, 2015
Hernandez v. Colvin
E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02142-CKD
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?