Rosales v City of Chico

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 06/26/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall be allowed to reopen the deposition of Defendant David Bailey that took place on April 1, 2015 to examine him regarding the material changes he made to his deposition at page 59 at lines 14, 16, and 19. 2. The scope of the examination shall be limited to the reasons for the changes, the facts and circumstances surrounding the changes and including the reasons for his use of force as described on page 59 at lines 14, 16 and 19 of the April 1, 2015 deposition transcript. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 19 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF CHICO; DAVID ) BAILEY; AND DOES 1 ) THROUGH 10 (in their ) official and/or ) capacities), ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________) 20 Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby issues the 21 following order: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 JOSEPH ROSALES, 1. Case NO.: 2:14-CV-02152-WBS-CMK ORDER TO REOPEN THE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT DAVID BAILEY Plaintiff shall be allowed to reopen the deposition of 23 Defendant David Bailey that took place on April 1, 2015 to 24 examine him regarding the material changes he made to his 25 deposition at page 59 at lines 14, 16, and 19. 26 2. The scope of the examination shall be limited to the 27 reasons for the changes, the facts and circumstances surrounding 28 the changes and including the reasons for his use of force as 1 ORDER TO REOPEN DEPOSITIION OF DEFENDANT DAVID BAILEY 1 described on page 59 at lines 14, 16 and 19 of the April 1, 2015 2 deposition transcript. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED: 5 6 Dated: June 26, 2015 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER TO REOPEN DEPOSITIION OF DEFENDANT DAVID BAILEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?