Owens v. Unknown
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/3/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHANE R. OWENS,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2169 KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
By order filed October 22, 2014, plaintiff’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was
18
dismissed, on the grounds that petitioner appeared to be challenging conditions of his
19
confinement, rather than the validity of a conviction or sentence. (ECF No. 4.) By that same
20
order, plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file a complaint. (Id.) More than thirty days have
21
now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
22
23
24
Plaintiff previously consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further
proceedings in this case. (ECF No. 3.) See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
25
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
Dated: December 3, 2014
27
28
owen2169.fta
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?