Owens v. Unknown

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/3/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE R. OWENS, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2169 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 By order filed October 22, 2014, plaintiff’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was 18 dismissed, on the grounds that petitioner appeared to be challenging conditions of his 19 confinement, rather than the validity of a conviction or sentence. (ECF No. 4.) By that same 20 order, plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file a complaint. (Id.) More than thirty days have 21 now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 23 24 Plaintiff previously consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case. (ECF No. 3.) See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 Dated: December 3, 2014 27 28 owen2169.fta 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?