Johnson v. Head et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/4/15 ORDERING that a Settlement Conference is set for 6/3/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference statements on or before May 27, 2015. (cc DAD)(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CARL JOHNSON,

11

No. 2:14-cv-2172 GEB CKD P

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

J. HEAD, et al.,

14

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.

15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights

16
17

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this case will benefit from a

18

settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd

19

for the Court’s Settlement Week program to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District

20

Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #27 on June 3, 2015 at 10:00

21

a.m.

22
23

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue concurrently with
this order.

24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. A settlement conference has been set for June 3, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom #27

26

before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street,

27

Sacramento, California 95814.

28

1

2. Each party is directed to have a principal capable of disposition at the Settlement

1
2

Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms at the Settlement

3

Conference.1
3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.

4
5

The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in

6

person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not

7

proceed and will be reset to another date.
4. The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference statements on or

8

before May 27, 2015 to the following email address: [e-mail].

9
10

Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement addressed to Magistrate Judge

11

Dale A. Drozd, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California

12

95814 so it arrives no later than May 27, 2015. The envelope shall be marked

13

“Confidential Settlement Statement.” Additionally, each party shall file a “Notice of

14

Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement.” (Rule 270(d)).

15
16

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the court nor served on

17

any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with

18

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051,
1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory
settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the
mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648,
653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993).
The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the
settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pittman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz.
2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The
purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of
the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to
settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full
authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1

2

1

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

2

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

3
4

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

5

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

6

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of

7

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in

8

dispute.

9
10
11

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.
d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
trial.

12

e. The relief sought.

13

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a

14
15
16
17
18
19

history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement
conference.
Dated: May 4, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3