Daniels v. Monroe/Lienberger Detention Centers et al
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/8/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed as to defendants Castaneda, Yakimtsev, Fristole, and Chan; and plaintiff be permitted to proceed on the original complaint against defendants Torres, Garcia, Galey and Gall. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LANDRY DANIELS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-2176 KJM CKD P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MONROE/LIENBERGER DETENTION
CENTERS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff commenced this action on September 19, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) On October 28,
17
18
2014, the undersigned determined that service was appropriate for defendants Torres, Garcia,
19
Galey, and Gall, and recommended that all other defendants be dismissed. (ECF No. 4.) Torres,
20
Garcia, Galey, and Gall have answered the complaint. (ECF Nos. 12-15.)
On April 8, 2015, the district judge dismissed the complaint and granted plaintiff leave to
21
22
file an amended complaint in an attempt to state a cognizable claim against defendants Castaneda,
23
Yakimtsev, Fristole, and Chan. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has been granted multiple extensions of
24
time to file an amended complaint and informed that no further extensions would be granted.
25
(ECF Nos. 19, 22, 25.) The final deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended
26
complaint.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
2
1. This action be dismissed as to defendants Castaneda, Yakimtsev, Fristole, and Chan.
3
4
5
See Local Rule 110; Red. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and
2. Plaintiff be permitted to proceed on the original complaint against defendants Torres,
Garcia, Galey, and Gall.
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
8
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
9
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
10
Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the
11
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
12
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
13
Dated: December 8, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
2 / dani2176.fta_fr(3)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?