Davis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Filing 19

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CONNOR ALBERT DAVIS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2182 WBS DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,

16

Defendants.

17
18

By an order filed March 23, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

19

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so

20

would result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day

21

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in

22

forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: May 15, 2015

5
6
7

DAD:9
davi2182.fifp

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2