Folkens v. Wyland, et al
Filing
7
ORDER continuing hearing signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/5/2014. Since the 6 Joint Status Report indicates matter is not ready for scheduling, the Status Conference is RE-SET for 3/9/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). A Further Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
PIETER AREND FOLKENS, dba A
HIGHER PORPOISE DESIGN
GROUP,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
No.
2:14-cv-02197-GEB-CKD
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M)
NOTICE
WYLAND (NFN), aka ROBERT
THOMAS WYLAND, an individual;
WYLAND WORLDWIDE, LLC, a
California corporation;
WYLAND GALLERIES, INC., a
California corporation;
SIGNATURE GALLERY GROUP,
INC., dba WYLAND GALLERIES;
and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
The Joint Status Report filed December 1, 2014, reveals
20
this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status
21
(Pretrial
22
December 15, 2014, is continued to March 9, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.
23
further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen
24
(14) days prior to the Status Conference.
Scheduling)
Conference
scheduled
for
hearing
on
A
25
Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the
26
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant
27
Signature Gallery Group, Inc. with process within the 120 day
28
period
prescribed
in
that
Rule
1
may
result
in
the
unserved
1
defendant
2
January 21, 2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for this
3
defendant
4
completed within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.
5
6
being
or
a
dismissed.
sufficient
To
avoid
explanation
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
dismissal,
December 5, 2014
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
why
on
service
or
before
was
not
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?