Johnson v. Sahota, et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER 14 for Consent Decree signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/2/2015. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Center for Disability Access Mark Potter, Esq., SBN 166317 Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771 Ray Ballister Jr., Esq., SBN 111282 Dennis Price, SBN 279082 Mail: PO Box 262490 San Diego, CA 92196-2490 Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92131 (858) 375-7385; (888) 422-5191 Fax: phylg@potterhandy.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Welch + Associates Michael D. Welch (SBN: 111022) 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA. 95814 Telephone: (916) 449-3930 Facsimile: (916) 449-3930 Attorney for Defendant 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 SCOTT JOHNSON Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-CV-02200-JAM-KJN vs. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER BALJINDER SAHOTA; HUMBERTO R. BEAS; and Does 1-10, Judge: Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ 16 17 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 25 26 1. Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON filed this action (known as Case No. 2:14-CV- 27 02200-JAM-KJN) against Defendants seeking money damages and injunctive relief for, 28 inter alia, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA") and CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 of 5 1 corresponding state law claims, as well as common law claims, in the United States District 2 Court for the Eastern District of California on September 23, 2014. Defendants BALJINDER 3 SAHOTA & HUMBERTO R. BEAS ("Defendants") filed his Answer to the Complaint on 4 October 31, 2014. 5 2. Defendants and Plaintiff (collectively sometimes referred to herein as the 6 “Parties” or separately as a “Party”) wish to settle the portion of the cases relating to issues 7 of injunctive relief and hereby desire to enter into this Consent Decree. The Parties hereby 8 enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving certain specified 9 aspects of the lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation, and without the admission 10 of any liability as to: (a) the amount of damages to which Plaintiff may be entitled or (b) the 11 amount of attorneys’ fees to which Plaintiff may be entitled. 12 13 JURISDICTION: 14 3. The Parties agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter for alleged 15 violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq. and 16 pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1367(a) for alleged violations of 17 California Civil Code §§51 and 54 et. seq. 18 4. In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, 19 the Parties agree to entry of this Order to resolve all claims regarding injunctive relief raised 20 in the above-entitled Actions. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of the proposed 21 Order related to this Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of the issues 22 addressed herein. 23 24 25 NO DISMISSAL OF ACTION REQUESTED: 26 5. As noted herein, monetary issues are still at issue and accordingly the Parties 27 do not request that the Honorable Court dismiss the action as these issues may still 28 proceed to trial. CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court’s entry of this Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows: 4 5 SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 6 6. This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of 7 Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants and any other parties for injunctive relief that have 8 arisen out of the acts and/or omissions alleged, or which could have been alleged, in the 9 subject Complaint. 7. 10 The Parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in 11 compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the 12 California Code of Regulations, Title 24-2 and the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act 13 Standards, unless other standards are specifically agreed to in this Consent Decree and 14 Order. 15 8. Remedial Measures: The corrective work agreed upon by the Parties is 16 attached here to as Exhibit “A”. Defendants agree to undertake all of the remedial work set 17 forth therein. 18 9. Timing of Injunctive Relief: Exhibit “A” also includes the estimated timeframe 19 for completing the work described therein. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent 20 Defendant from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief within the timeframes 21 specified, Defendant or his counsel will notify Plaintiff’s counsel, in writing, within fifteen 22 (15) days after discovering any such difficulties. Defendant, or his counsel, will promptly 23 notify Plaintiff’s counsel when the corrective work is complete, and in any case, will provide 24 a status report on or before March 1, 2016. 25 26 27 ISSUES RELATED TO DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND COSTS REMAIN UNRESOLVED: 28 CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3 of 5 1 10. The Parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiff’s claims for 2 damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and costs in this Action (collectively, the 3 “Unresolved Issues”). These Unresolved Issues shall be the subject of further negotiation, 4 settlement, litigation, and/or motions to the Court. Should the Parties later reach an 5 agreement regarding the Unresolved Issues, the terms of that agreement will be set forth in 6 a separate settlement agreement. Nothing set forth herein shall be deemed to in any way 7 limit or effect a waiver of either of Plaintiff’s past, present, or future rights and/or remedies 8 to recover damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, or costs in connection with each of 9 his alleged losses, costs, damages, claims, and causes of action as set forth in each of the 10 operative Complaints or otherwise. 11 12 ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER: 13 11. This Consent Decree and Order and Exhibit “A” to the Consent Decree, which 14 is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire 15 agreement between the signing Parties on all matters of injunctive relief, and no other 16 statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the Parties or 17 agents of any of the Parties, that is not contained in this written Consent Decree and Order, 18 shall be enforceable regarding the matters of injunctive relief specifically described herein. 19 20 TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER: 21 12. This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of 22 twenty four (24) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, or until 23 the injunctive relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later. The 24 Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this Order for twenty four 25 (24) months after the date of this Consent Decree, or until the relief contemplated by this 26 Order is completed, whichever occurs later. 27 SEVERABILITY: 28 CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 4 of 5 1 13. If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be 2 unenforceable, all other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless remain 3 in full force and effect. 4 5 SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES: 6 14. Signatories on the behalf of the Parties represent that they are authorized to 7 bind the Parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may be 8 signed in counterparts and a facsimile or e-mail signature shall have the same force and 9 effect as an original signature. 10 11 Respectfully Submitted, 12 13 Dated: November 30, 2015 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 14 By:Teresa Allen TERESA ALLEN Counsel for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON 15 16 17 Dated: November 30, 2015 MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES 18 19 By:/s/Michael D. Welch MICHAEL D. WELCH Counsel for Defendants BALJINDER SAHOTA & HUMBERTO R. BEAS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 27 28 CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?