Johnson v. Sahota, et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER 14 for Consent Decree signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/2/2015. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Center for Disability Access
Mark Potter, Esq., SBN 166317
Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771
Ray Ballister Jr., Esq., SBN 111282
Dennis Price, SBN 279082
Mail: PO Box 262490
San Diego, CA 92196-2490
Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92131
(858) 375-7385; (888) 422-5191
Fax: phylg@potterhandy.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Michael Welch + Associates
Michael D. Welch (SBN: 111022)
770 L Street, Suite 950
Sacramento, CA. 95814
Telephone: (916) 449-3930
Facsimile: (916) 449-3930
Attorney for Defendant
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
SCOTT JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:14-CV-02200-JAM-KJN
vs.
CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER
BALJINDER SAHOTA;
HUMBERTO R. BEAS; and Does 1-10,
Judge: Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
25
26
1.
Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON filed this action (known as Case No. 2:14-CV-
27
02200-JAM-KJN) against Defendants seeking money damages and injunctive relief for,
28
inter alia, violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA") and
CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1 of 5
1
corresponding state law claims, as well as common law claims, in the United States District
2
Court for the Eastern District of California on September 23, 2014. Defendants BALJINDER
3
SAHOTA & HUMBERTO R. BEAS ("Defendants") filed his Answer to the Complaint on
4
October 31, 2014.
5
2.
Defendants and Plaintiff (collectively sometimes referred to herein as the
6
“Parties” or separately as a “Party”) wish to settle the portion of the cases relating to issues
7
of injunctive relief and hereby desire to enter into this Consent Decree. The Parties hereby
8
enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving certain specified
9
aspects of the lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation, and without the admission
10
of any liability as to: (a) the amount of damages to which Plaintiff may be entitled or (b) the
11
amount of attorneys’ fees to which Plaintiff may be entitled.
12
13
JURISDICTION:
14
3.
The Parties agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter for alleged
15
violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq. and
16
pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1367(a) for alleged violations of
17
California Civil Code §§51 and 54 et. seq.
18
4.
In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation,
19
the Parties agree to entry of this Order to resolve all claims regarding injunctive relief raised
20
in the above-entitled Actions. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of the proposed
21
Order related to this Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of the issues
22
addressed herein.
23
24
25
NO DISMISSAL OF ACTION REQUESTED:
26
5.
As noted herein, monetary issues are still at issue and accordingly the Parties
27
do not request that the Honorable Court dismiss the action as these issues may still
28
proceed to trial.
CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court’s entry of this
Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows:
4
5
SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:
6
6.
This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of
7
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants and any other parties for injunctive relief that have
8
arisen out of the acts and/or omissions alleged, or which could have been alleged, in the
9
subject Complaint.
7.
10
The Parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in
11
compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the
12
California Code of Regulations, Title 24-2 and the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act
13
Standards, unless other standards are specifically agreed to in this Consent Decree and
14
Order.
15
8.
Remedial Measures:
The corrective work agreed upon by the Parties is
16
attached here to as Exhibit “A”. Defendants agree to undertake all of the remedial work set
17
forth therein.
18
9.
Timing of Injunctive Relief: Exhibit “A” also includes the estimated timeframe
19
for completing the work described therein. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent
20
Defendant from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief within the timeframes
21
specified, Defendant or his counsel will notify Plaintiff’s counsel, in writing, within fifteen
22
(15) days after discovering any such difficulties. Defendant, or his counsel, will promptly
23
notify Plaintiff’s counsel when the corrective work is complete, and in any case, will provide
24
a status report on or before March 1, 2016.
25
26
27
ISSUES RELATED TO DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES,
AND COSTS REMAIN UNRESOLVED:
28
CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3 of 5
1
10.
The Parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiff’s claims for
2
damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and costs in this Action (collectively, the
3
“Unresolved Issues”). These Unresolved Issues shall be the subject of further negotiation,
4
settlement, litigation, and/or motions to the Court. Should the Parties later reach an
5
agreement regarding the Unresolved Issues, the terms of that agreement will be set forth in
6
a separate settlement agreement. Nothing set forth herein shall be deemed to in any way
7
limit or effect a waiver of either of Plaintiff’s past, present, or future rights and/or remedies
8
to recover damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, or costs in connection with each of
9
his alleged losses, costs, damages, claims, and causes of action as set forth in each of the
10
operative Complaints or otherwise.
11
12
ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER:
13
11.
This Consent Decree and Order and Exhibit “A” to the Consent Decree, which
14
is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire
15
agreement between the signing Parties on all matters of injunctive relief, and no other
16
statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the Parties or
17
agents of any of the Parties, that is not contained in this written Consent Decree and Order,
18
shall be enforceable regarding the matters of injunctive relief specifically described herein.
19
20
TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER:
21
12.
This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of
22
twenty four (24) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, or until
23
the injunctive relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later. The
24
Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this Order for twenty four
25
(24) months after the date of this Consent Decree, or until the relief contemplated by this
26
Order is completed, whichever occurs later.
27
SEVERABILITY:
28
CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 4 of 5
1
13.
If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be
2
unenforceable, all other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless remain
3
in full force and effect.
4
5
SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES:
6
14.
Signatories on the behalf of the Parties represent that they are authorized to
7
bind the Parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may be
8
signed in counterparts and a facsimile or e-mail signature shall have the same force and
9
effect as an original signature.
10
11
Respectfully Submitted,
12
13
Dated: November 30, 2015
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
14
By:Teresa Allen
TERESA ALLEN
Counsel for Plaintiff
SCOTT JOHNSON
15
16
17
Dated: November 30, 2015
MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES
18
19
By:/s/Michael D. Welch
MICHAEL D. WELCH
Counsel for Defendants
BALJINDER SAHOTA &
HUMBERTO R. BEAS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2015
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
27
28
CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?