Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/13/2015 ORDERING 13 no later than 6/30/2016 the Service shall submit to the Federal Register for publication a 12-month finding as to whether the listing of the Eagle Lake ra inbow trout as a threatened or endangered species is warranted; Defendants agree to pay Plaintiff $10,850.00 in settlement of the attorneys' fees and costs in this matter; the terms of this Agreement shall become effective upon entry of an order by the Court adopting the Agreement; upon adoption of this Agreement by the Court, all counts of Plaintiff's complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice; Notwithstanding the dismissal of this action, however, the parties hereby stipulate a nd respectfully request that the Court retain jurisdiction to oversee compliance with the terms of this Agreement and to resolve any motions to modify such terms; the terms and conditions of the parties' Stipulated Settlement Agreement are hereby ADOPTED as a enforceable ORDER of this Court. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
René P. Voss (CA Bar No. 255758)
15 Alderney Road
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Phone: (415) 446-9027
Email: renepvoss@gmail.com
Paul D. Ruprecht (OR Bar. No. 132762)
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
126 NE Alberta Street, Suite 208
Portland, OR 97211-2665
Phone: (208) 421-4637
Email: paul@westernwatersheds.org
Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT,
Plaintiff,
v.
S.M.R. JEWELL, in her official capacity
as Secretary of the United States
Department of the Interior; DAN ASHE,
in his official capacity as Director of the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service;
and the UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
)
)
STIPULATED SETTLEMENT
)
AGREEMENT AND ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
26
27
28
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
1
1
This Stipulated Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between
2
Plaintiff Western Watersheds Project (“WWP”) and Defendants S.M.R. Jewell, in her official
3
capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Dan Ashe, in his official
4
capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”); and the United
5
States Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively, “Defendants”), who, by and through their
6
undersigned counsel, state as follows:
7
WHEREAS, in 2003, Mr. John Bosta submitted a petition to the Service requesting that
8
the Service list the Eagle Lake rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aquilarum) as an
9
Endangered or Threatened Species under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”);
10
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2012, the Service issued a “90-day finding,” in which the
11
Service determined that the Eagle Lake rainbow trout may be warranted for listing as an
12
Endangered or Threatened Species. 77 Fed. Reg. 54548;
13
WHEREAS, WWP sent a letter to Defendants on May 13, 2014, stating its intent to file
14
suit to compel the Service to issue a finding pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(B) (“12-month
15
finding”) as to whether the listing of the Eagle Lake rainbow trout is warranted, not warranted, or
16
warranted but precluded;
17
18
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2014, WWP filed the above-captioned action to compel
the Service to issue a 12-month finding pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(B);
19
WHEREAS, the parties, through their authorized representatives, and without any
20
admission or final adjudication of the issues of fact or law with respect to Plaintiff’s claims, have
21
reached a settlement that they consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable resolution of the
22
disputes set forth in Plaintiff’s complaint;
23
24
WHEREAS, the parties agree that settlement of this action in this manner is in the public
interest and is an appropriate way to resolve the dispute between them;
25
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
26
1.
27
No later than June 30, 2016, the Service shall submit to the Federal Register for
publication a 12-month finding as to whether the listing of the Eagle Lake rainbow trout as a
28
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
2
1
threatened or endangered species is (a) not warranted; (b) warranted; or (c) warranted but
2
precluded by other pending proposals, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(B).
3
2.
Either party may seek to modify the deadline specified in Paragraph 1 for good
4
cause shown, consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In that event, or in the event
5
that either party believes that the other party has failed to comply with any term or condition of
6
this Agreement, the parties shall use the dispute resolution procedures specified in Paragraph 3,
7
below.
8
9
3.
The Order entering this Agreement may be modified by the Court upon good
cause shown, consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by written stipulation
10
between the parties filed with and approved by the Court, or upon written motion filed by one of
11
the parties and granted by the Court. In the event that either party seeks to modify the terms of
12
this Agreement, including the deadline specified in Paragraph 1, or in the event of a dispute
13
arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or in the event that either party believes that the
14
other party has failed to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, the party seeking
15
the modification, raising the dispute, or seeking enforcement shall provide the other party with
16
notice of the claim or modification. The parties agree that they will meet and confer (either
17
telephonically or in person) at the earliest possible time in a good-faith effort to resolve the claim
18
before seeking relief from the Court. If the parties are unable to resolve the claim themselves,
19
either party may seek relief from the Court. In the event that Defendants fail to meet the deadline
20
in Paragraph 1 and have not sought to modify it, Plaintiff’s first remedy shall be a motion to
21
enforce the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not, in the first instance, be
22
enforceable through a proceeding for contempt of court.
23
4.
No party shall use this Agreement or the terms herein as evidence of what does or
24
does not constitute a reasonable timeline for issuing a 12-month finding under 16 U.S.C. § 1533
25
in any other proceeding regarding the Service’s implementation of the ESA.
26
5.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed or offered as evidence in any
27
proceeding as an admission or concession of any wrongdoing, liability, or any issue of fact or
28
law concerning the claims settled under this Agreement. Defendants do not waive any defenses
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
3
1
they may have concerning the claim under this Agreement or any similar claims brought in the
2
future by any other party. This Agreement is executed for the purpose of settling Plaintiff’s
3
Complaint, and nothing herein shall be construed as precedent or having preclusive effect in any
4
other context.
5
6.
No provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted as, or constitute, a
6
commitment or requirement that Defendants take action in contravention of the ESA, the
7
Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), or any other law or regulation, either substantive or
8
procedural. This Agreement only requires that Federal Defendants take actions by the deadline
9
specified in Paragraph 1. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or modify the
10
discretion accorded to the Service by the ESA, the APA, or general principles of administrative
11
law with respect to the procedures to be followed in making any determination required herein,
12
or as to the substance of any final determination. To challenge any determination issued pursuant
13
to Paragraph 1, Plaintiff must file a separate action. Plaintiff reserves the right to challenge
14
substantive decisions made by Defendants pursuant to Paragraph 1 above, and Defendants
15
reserve the right to raise any applicable claims or defenses to such challenges.
16
7.
Defendants agree that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees in this
17
action and agree to pay Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Section 11(g)
18
of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g). Therefore, Defendants agree to pay Plaintiff $10,850.00 in
19
settlement of the attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter. Plaintiff agrees to accept this amount in
20
full satisfaction of any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action for attorneys’ fees
21
and costs incurred in connection with the above captioned litigation pursuant to the Equal Access
22
to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), and/or any other statute
23
and/or common law theory, through and including the date of this agreement. Plaintiff agrees
24
that receipt of this payment from Defendants shall operate as a release of Plaintiff’s claims for
25
attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter, through and including the date of this agreement.
26
8.
Plaintiff agrees to furnish Defendants with the information necessary to effectuate
27
this payment. Defendants agree to submit all necessary paperwork for the processing of the
28
attorneys’ fees award to the Department of the Treasury’s Judgment Fund Office, pursuant to 16
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
4
1
U.S.C. § 1540(g)(4), within ten (10) days of the receipt of the necessary information from
2
Plaintiff or the approval of this Agreement by the Court, whichever is later. Plaintiff’s attorneys
3
agree to send confirmation of the receipt of the payment to counsel for Defendants within 14
4
days of such payment.
5
9.
Plaintiff reserves the right to seek additional fees and costs incurred subsequent to
6
this Agreement arising in any future litigation or continuation of the present action. Defendants
7
reserve the right to contest fees claimed by Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s counsel, including hourly rates
8
and the number of hours billed, in any future litigation or continuation of the present action.
9
Further, this Agreement as to attorneys’ fees and costs has no precedential value and shall not be
10
11
used as evidence in any other attorneys’ fees litigation.
10.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as, or shall constitute, a
12
requirement that Defendants are obligated to pay any funds exceeding those available, or take
13
any action in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other
14
applicable appropriations law. The parties agree that this Agreement was negotiated in good faith
15
and that this Agreement constitutes a settlement of claims that were denied and disputed by the
16
parties. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not waive any claim or defense except as
17
expressly stated herein. The Agreement contains all of the agreement between the parties, and is
18
intended to be the final and sole agreement between the parties. The parties agree that any prior
19
or contemporaneous representations or understanding not explicitly contained in this written
20
Agreement, whether written or oral, are of no further legal or equitable force or effect.
21
11.
The undersigned representatives of each party certify that they are fully
22
authorized by the party or parties they represent to agree to the Court’s entry of the terms and
23
conditions of this Agreement and do hereby agree to the terms herein.
24
25
26
12.
The terms of this Agreement shall become effective upon entry of an order by the
Court adopting the Agreement.
13.
Upon adoption of this Agreement by the Court, all counts of Plaintiff’s complaint
27
shall be dismissed with prejudice. Notwithstanding the dismissal of this action, however, the
28
parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court retain jurisdiction to oversee
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
5
1
compliance with the terms of this Agreement and to resolve any motions to modify such terms.
2
See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).
3
Respectfully submitted this 12th day of March, 2015.
4
5
6
7
8
/s/ René Voss
René P. Voss (CA Bar No. 255758)
15 Alderney Road
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Phone: (415) 446-9027
Email: renepvoss@gmail.com
13
/s/ Paul D. Ruprecht
Paul D. Ruprecht (OR Bar. No. 132762)
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
126 NE Alberta Street, Suite 208
Portland, OR 97211-2665
Phone: (208) 421-4637
Email: paul@westernwatersheds.org
Pro Hac Vice
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
10
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
JOHN C. CRUDEN,
Assistant Attorney General
SETH M. BARSKY, Chief
KRISTEN L. GUSTAFSON,
Assistant Chief
/s/ Travis J. Annatoyn
TRAVIS J. ANNATOYN
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
(202) 514-5243 (tel)
(202) 305-0275 (fax)
travis.annatoyn@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
27
28
Western Watersheds Project v. Jewell, et al., 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Order
6
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT,
Plaintiff,
v.
S.M.R. JEWELL, in her official capacity
as Secretary of the United States
Department of the Interior; DAN ASHE,
in his official capacity as Director of the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service;
and the UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02205-MCE-KJN
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
14
ORDER
15
16
17
18
The terms and conditions of the parties’ Stipulated Settlement Agreement are hereby
adopted as an enforceable ORDER of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 13, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?